Medical Cannabis Certifications for Severe Chronic and Intractable Pain: Discerning Geographic Patterns Across Pennsylvania, USA
Mehta, S. K.; Tusing, L. D.; Higazy, A.; Piper, B. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionChronic pain is the most common qualifying condition found in states with medical cannabis (MC). We conducted a study assessing the geographic distribution of MC certifications for severe chronic or intractable pain in Pennsylvania (PA) between 2018 to 2024, identifying relationships between median household income and ethnic background with the percentage of adults with a MC certification for pain. MethodsUsing data from the PA Department of Health (PDOH) from 2018 to 2024 (N = 44,645 to 165,740 certifications for pain / year), we mapped Zip codes associated with MC certifications for pain to counties and Zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs). The difference between the highest and lowest counties was determined. A linear regression evaluated correlations between community variables and the percentage of adults in geographical areas with a MC certification for pain in 2024. ResultsThere was an almost a four-fold difference in the percent of adults with a MC certification for pain in the highest (Perry = 2.3%) versus lowest (Tioga = 0.6%) counties in 2024. Bradford and Tioga County had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower percentage certified relative to the county-wide average. There was a significantly higher proportion of certifications for pain in counties with larger population densities of adults (1.76 +/- 0.12%) than counties with smaller population densities (1.38% +/- 0.14%) of adults (t(65) = 4.66, p < 0.001, d = 1.14). At the county level, higher median household income was associated with a greater percentage of adults with MC (r(65) = +0.34, p < 0.01). At the ZCTA level, the proportion of non-White individuals, including Hispanics, showed a modest, but significant, inverse association with MC certification (r(1,722) = -0.07, p < 0.01). ConclusionsThis study identified four-fold county level disparities in MC certifications for pain. The association between median household income and MC pain certifications may indicate differences in accessibility of MC based on financial status. Further research may be warranted pending any changes to the legal status or demand for MC.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A shared genetic signature for common chronic pain conditions and its impact on biopsychosocial traits 91%
- Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use 91%
- Welfare Policies, Arthritis-related Joint Pain Prevalence and Educational Gaps in 50 U.S. States from 2011 to 2021: A Fixed Effects Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond Black vs White: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Chronic Pain including Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and Multiracial U.S. Adults 94%
- Pain among US adults before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. 92%
- The Contribution of Circulating Endocannabinoid Tone to Individual Differences in Human Pain Sensitivity: A Quantitative Sensory Testing Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gender differences in PTSD severity and pain outcomes: baseline results from the LAMP trial 90%
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 90%
- Trends of long-term opioid therapy and subsequent discontinuation among people with chronic non-cancer pain in UK primary care: a retrospective cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term variability of chronic musculoskeletal pain 92%
- Autonomic Nervous System Markers of Music-Elicited Analgesia in People with Fibromyalgia: A Double-Blind Randomized Pilot Study 88%
- Relationships of Prescription Opioid Sales to Opiate Treatment Admissions and Overdose Deaths: A Reanalysis of Relationships -- United States 2010-2019 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.