Gradual sensory maturation promotes abstract representation learning
Cheon, J.; Paik, S.-B.
Show abstract
Human infants begin life with limited visual capacities, such as low acuity and poor color sensitivity, due to gradual sensory maturation. In contrast, machine learning models are trained on high-fidelity inputs from the outset, often leading to shortcut learning and overfitting to spurious correlations. Here, we show that early sensory immaturity plays a critical role in shaping bias-resistant, abstract visual representations that conventional models struggle to develop. Using neural network simulations and human psychophysics experiments, we demonstrate that gradual sensory development supports the emergence of robust and generalizable internal representations, reduces reliance on superficial cues, and promotes disentangled representations that enable compositional reconstruction and visual imagination. Comparative analyses of human and model behavior reveal shared patterns of bias resistance and adaptive generalization, including resilience to misleading information. Our findings suggest that gradual sensory maturation is not merely a developmental constraint, but rather a key mechanism that enables abstract representation learning. One sentence summaryEarly-stage sensory immaturity guides the development of abstract, bias-resistant representations that enable generalization and compositionality, providing a functional account of gradual sensory maturation. HighlightsO_LIThe essential yet overlooked role of gradual sensory maturation was explored C_LIO_LIEarly sensory immaturity promotes abstract representations resistant to shortcut learning C_LIO_LIEmergent representations support compositional reconstruction of novel visual attributes C_LIO_LIHuman and model behaviors show similar bias resistance and adaptive generalization C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.