Microbiome diversity of low biomass skin sites is captured by metagenomics but not 16S amplicon sequencing
Markey, L.; Qu, E. B.; Mendall, C.; Finzel, A.; Materna, A.; Lieberman, T. D.
Show abstract
Established workflows for microbiome analysis work well for high microbial biomass samples, like stool, but often fail to accurately define microbial communities when applied to low microbial biomass samples. Here, we systemically compare microbiome analysis methods --16S rRNA sequencing, shallow metagenomics, and qPCR PMP panels--as well as extraction methods across skin swab samples and mock community dilutions. While extraction method minimally impacted results, with no significant signal for method-specific contamination or bias, we observed critical differences in inferred composition across analysis methods for low biomass samples. Metagenomic sequencing and qPCR revealed concordant, diverse microbial communities on low biomass leg skin samples, whereas 16S amplicon sequencing exhibited extreme bias toward the most abundant taxon. Both qPCR and metagenomics showed that female genital tract bacteria dominated the leg skin microbiome in about half of female subjects. Metagenomics also enabled sub-species analysis, which demonstrated that individuals have consistent within-species diversity across high-biomass forehead and low-biomass leg skin sites. This work illustrates that shallow metagenomics provides the necessary sensitivity and taxonomic resolution to characterize species and strain-level diversity in extremely low biomass samples, opening possibilities for microbiome discovery in previously unexplored niches. ImportanceDespite the importance of the skin microbiome in health and disease, there have been far fewer studies characterizing the microbiome of skin compared to that of the gut. In part, this is because microbiome methods were initially developed for bacteria-rich samples like stool and these methods perform poorly on bacteria-poor samples like skin swabs. The perceived difficulty of getting reliable data from such low biomass sites has limited the scope and types of analyses performed. Here we demonstrate that shotgun, whole-genome, metagenomic sequencing recovers the full input from even very dilute control community samples, and reveals a highly diverse population even on very low biomass skin sites. We describe a streamlined sample processing and analysis pipeline which can be applied broadly to characterize low biomass microbiome samples and reveal new host-microbiome interactions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Illumina Complete Long Read Assay yields contiguous bacterial genomes from human gut metagenomes 96%
- A reproducible and tunable synthetic soil microbial community provides new insights into microbial ecology 96%
- Longitudinal, Multi-platform Metagenomics Yields a High-quality Genomic Catalog and Guides an In Vitro Model for Cheese Communities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbial context predicts SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in patients and the hospital built environment 95%
- Altitude-dependent agro-ecologies impact the microbiome diversity of scavenging indigenous chicken in Ethiopia 95%
- Single Amplified Genome Catalog Reveals the Dynamics of Mobilome and Resistome in the Human Microbiome 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Yanomami skin microbiome complexity challenges prevailing concepts of healthy skin. 95%
- Growth phase estimation for abundant bacterial populations sampled longitudinally from human stool metagenomes. 95%
- Genome-centric analysis of short and long read metagenomes reveals uncharacterized microbiome diversity in Southeast Asians 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Skin bacterial community dynamics of hands and forearms before and after military field exercise 95%
- Utilizing co-abundances of antimicrobial resistance genes to identify potential co-selection in the resistome 94%
- High-throughput single-cell isolation of Bifidobacterium strains from the gut microbiome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.