Back

Multicenter Evaluation of Myocardial Flow Reserve as a Prognostic Marker for Mortality in 13N-Ammonia PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Ramirez, G.; Builoff, V.; Miller, R.; Lemley, M.; Carvajal Juarez, I.; Alexanderson, E.; Rosamond, T. L.; Song, N.; Travin, M.; Slipczuk Bustamante, L.; Einstein, A.; Wopperer, S.; Di Carli, M. F.; Chareonthaitawee, P.; Slomka, P.

2025-06-25 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.06.24.25330229 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMyocardial flow reserve (MFR), measured by PET MPI, provides valuable information on epicardial coronary disease, diffuse atherosclerosis, and microvascular function. Despite its routine use, the prognostic efficacy of 13N-ammonia PET MFR remains unconfirmed in larger multicenter cohorts of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). MethodsWe considered patients from five sites in the REFINE PET registry who underwent 13N-ammonia PET MPI for CAD. Clinical and imaging data were collected at the time of MPI. MFR was quantified as the ratio of stress to rest myocardial blood flow, using QPET software (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models adjusted for clinical and imaging covariates. ResultsIn total, 6277 patients were included (mean age of 64 years, 56% male). Median follow-up time was 3.8 years. There were 1895 patients with MFR [&le;]2 and 4382 with MFR >2. Patients with MFR [&le;]2 had significantly higher mortality than those with MFR >2 (n=701 [37.0%] vs. n=537 [12.3%], respectively; p<0.001). Annualized ACM rates by MFR and SSS ranged from 1.7 to 11.6. In multivariable analysis, MFR [&le;]2 was independently associated with increased ACM in the overall population (HR 2.70, 95% CI 2.41-3.03, p<0.001), even among patients with no perfusion defects (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.93-2.89; p<0.001). Mortality risk decreased across increasing MFR deciles ranging from HR 2.73 (95% CI 2.39-3.11) to HR 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.49). ConclusionIn this large multicenter cohort, MFR derived from 13N-ammonia PET MPI is a strong, independent predictor of ACM, even in patients with normal perfusion. An MFR of [&le;]2.0 identifies elevated risk, while higher values are associated with improved survival. These findings support the routine integration of MFR to enhance risk stratification in patients with suspected or known CAD.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.7%
2
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
3
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
5
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
9
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
11
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%