Rt.GLM: Unifying estimation of the time-varying reproduction number, Rt , under the Generalised Linear and Additive Models.
nouvellet, p.
Show abstract
Most current methods to estimate the time-varying reproduction number (Rt), such as EpiEstim, rely on branching processes and the renewal equation. They also require subjective choices to set the level of temporal and spatial heterogeneity assumed. We propose a novel framework to estimate Rt based on Generalized Linear and Additive Models (GLM/GAM). By integrating the renewal equation model within GLM/GAM, the proposed framework, "Rt.glm", allows smooth estimation of Rt variations over time and space without relying on arbitrary scaling parameters. The performance of Rt.glm was evaluated using historical datasets and simulated outbreaks. It demonstrated improved overall performance and accuracy compared to EpiEstim, as measured by the CRPS scores and Mean Square Errors respectively. However, when case incidence was low and Rt estimation relied on a smoothing term, Rt.glm was marginally overconfident in its estimates. The method offers substantial improvement for the real-time estimation of spatio-temporal trends in Rt, with improved performance and lower reliance on arbitrarily set parameters. The open-source and user-friendly R package developed will also simplify user experience. Finally, the framework bridges gaps between epidemic monitoring methodologies and sets the stage for future extensions to enhance statistical inference and integrate additional epidemiological complexities, including the evaluation of intervention strategies. HighlightsO_LIA novel framework is introduced to estimate Rt using GLM and GAM approaches. C_LIO_LIThis allows smooth spatio-temporal estimation of Rt without predefined scales. C_LIO_LIOverall, it outperforms EpiEstim, with lower Mean Square Error and CRPS scores. C_LIO_LIAn open-source, user-friendly R package is provided for real-time Rt estimation. C_LIO_LIThis proof-of-concept provides a strong foundation for future developments. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensible Long-lead Forecast of COVID-19 Epidemic Outcomes 95%
- EpiFusion: Joint inference of the effective reproduction number by integrating phylodynamic and epidemiological modelling with particle filtering 95%
- Nowcasting by Bayesian Smoothing: A flexible, generalizable model for real-time epidemic tracking 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Basic reproduction number for pandemic Escherichia coli clones varies markedly and can be comparable to pandemic influenza viruses 95%
- Rapid incidence estimation from SARS-CoV-2 genomes reveals decreased case detection in Europe during summer 2020 94%
- Controlling COVID-19 via test-trace-quarantine 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the reproduction number and transmission heterogeneity from the size distribution of clusters of identical pathogen sequences 95%
- Quantifying Asymptomatic Infection and Transmission of COVID-19 in New York City using Observed Cases, Serology and Testing Capacity 94%
- Tracking and predicting the African COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative evaluation of methodologies for estimating the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in the context of COVID-19: a simulation study 94%
- Misclassification of yellow fever vaccination status revealed through hierarchical Bayesian modeling 93%
- Insights into COVID-19 epidemiology and control from temporal changes in serial interval distributions in Hong Kong 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.