EEG-GAN: A Generative EEG Augmentation Toolkit for Enhancing Neural Classification
Williams, C. C.; Weinhardt, D.; Hewson, J.; Plomecka, M. B.; Langer, N.; Musslick, S.
Show abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a widely applied method for decoding neural activity, offering insights into cognitive function and driving advancements in neurotechnology. However, decoding EEG data remains challenging, as classification algorithms typically require large datasets that are expensive and time-consuming to collect. Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence have enabled the creation of realistic synthetic EEG data, yet no method has consistently demonstrated that such synthetic data can lead to improvements in EEG decodability across diverse datasets. Here, we introduce EEG-GAN, an open-source generative adversarial network (GAN) designed to augment EEG data. In the most comprehensive evaluation study to date, we assessed its capacity to generate realistic EEG samples and enhance classification performance across four datasets, five classifiers, and seven sample sizes, while benchmarking it against six established augmentation techniques. We found that EEG-GAN, when trained to generate raw single-trial EEG signals, produced signals that reproduce grand-averaged waveforms and time-frequency patterns of the original data. Furthermore, training classifiers on additional synthetic data improved their ability to decode held-out empirical data. EEG-GAN achieved up to a 16% improvement in decoding accuracy, with enhancements consistent across datasets but varying among classifiers. Data augmentations were particularly effective for smaller sample sizes (30 and below), significantly improving 70% of these classification analyses and only significantly impairing 4% of analyses. Moreover, EEG-GAN significantly outperformed all benchmark techniques in 69% of the comparisons across datasets, classifiers, and sample sizes and was only significantly outperformed in 3% of comparisons. These findings establish EEG-GAN as a robust toolkit for generating realistic EEG data, which can effectively reduce the costs associated with real-world EEG data collection for neural decoding tasks.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Harmonizing and aligning M/EEG datasets with covariance-based techniques to enhance predictive regression modeling 94%
- Dynamic Network Analysis of Electrophysiological Task Data 93%
- Alignment massive of auditory individual artificial networks with fMRI brain data leads to generalizable improvements in brain encoding and downstream tasks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A large and rich EEG dataset for modeling human visual object recognition 95%
- Class imbalance should not throw you off balance: Choosing the right classifiers and performance metrics for brain decoding with imbalanced data 94%
- Post-hoc modification of linear models: combining machine learning with domain information to make solid inferences from noisy data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.