Back

Assessing the Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Ceramic Structures for Coral Restoration: Growth, Survivorship, and Biodiversity Using Visual Surveys and eDNA

Yu, V.; Corley, A.; Lau, H.; Thompson, P. D.; Wong, J.; Wan, Z. W.; McIlroy, S.; Baker, D. M.

2025-07-21 ecology
10.1101/2025.06.23.660499 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coral reef degradation has spurred the development of artificial structures to mitigate losses in coral cover. These structures serve as substrates for coral transplantation, with the expectation that growing corals will attract reef-associated taxa -- while the substrates ability to directly support biodiversity is often neglected. We evaluated a novel 3D-printed modular tile made of porous terra cotta, designed with complex surface structures to enhance micro- and cryptic biodiversity, through a restoration project in Hong Kong. Over four years, we monitored 378 outplanted coral fragments using diver assessments and photography, while biodiversity changes were assessed through visual surveys and eDNA metabarcoding. Coral survivorship was high, with 88% of transplants surviving by the studys end. The restoration site exhibited greater fish and macroinvertebrate abundance compared to a nearby unrestored area. eDNA analyses revealed 23.5% higher eukaryote ASV richness at the restoration site than the unrestored site and a 13.3% increase relative to a natural reference coral community. This study highlights the tiles dual functionality: (1) supporting coral growth and (2) enhancing cryptic biodiversity, an aspect often neglected in traditional reef restoration efforts. Our findings underscore the potential of 3D-printed ceramic structures to improve both coral restoration outcomes and broader reef ecosystem recovery.

Published in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.