Negative online experiences and reporting rates in youth with mental health conditions
Kass, M. C.; Alexander, L.; Connell, T.; Bagheri Hamaneh, S.; Abdullah, N.; Freund, M.; Milham, M.; Nikolaidis, A.
Show abstract
ImportanceNegative online experiences (NOE) are highly prevalent and pose significant dangers for youth with mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions. ObjectiveIdentify risk factors of NOE and reporting barriers in youths. DesignCross-sectional survey study (January to July 2023) and qualitative follow-up study (March to May 2023). SettingA community-based sample from the Child Mind Institutes Healthy Brain Network (HBN), a transdiagnostic research initiative in New York. ParticipantsA total of 1,009 youth aged 9-15 years (mean [SD] age, 11.79 [1.71] years; 585 [58.55%] male) completed a 310-item quantitative survey. The qualitative follow-up study (n=109) included four administrations of a 3-day online bulletin board. Exposure(s)Not applicable. Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes include prevalence and risk factors of NOE and reporting behaviors and barriers. Qualitative analyses provided insights into youths mental models and cognitive schemas about different NOE forms. ResultsOf the 1,129 enrolled participants, 1,009 participants completed the study (89.37%). Over one-fourth (265 [26.6%]) encountered NOE in the past year, with 182 [68.7%] reporting multiple incidents. However, only 53 [20.0%] reported the incident. Mental health symptoms (p<.01) and parenting styles (p<.001) increased the risk of NOE. Factor analyses identified three key reporting barriers: Reporting Process, Reporting Policy, and Emotional Barriers. Age, social aptitude, mental health symptoms, and parenting styles predicted the likelihood of experiencing the reporting barriers. Analyses of the qualitative follow-up study noted that youths decision-making process regarding reporting considers three areas: degree of malice, perpetrators intent, and included NOE forms. Ambiguity in these areas contributed to higher reporting uncertainty. Conclusions and RelevanceFindings highlight a gap between the prevalence of NOE and reporting rates in youths with mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions. Demographic, clinical, and parenting factors were risk factors of experiencing NOE or a reporting barrier, underscoring the need for targeted and multifaceted solutions. Potential solutions to aid in safer online spaces are proposed for policymakers, technology developers, clinicians, and educators. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhen encountering negative online experiences (NOE), what influences reporting likelihood in youth with mental health conditions? FindingsHigh prevalence and low reporting rates of NOE were observed. Analyses identified Reporting Process, Reporting Policy, and Emotional as key reporting barriers. Parenting styles, mental health symptoms, and demographics were associated with increased likelihood of experiencing NOE or the identified barriers. The qualitative follow-up study provided insights into youths thought processes regarding NOE. MeaningOur findings document key reporting barriers in children and adolescents with mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions and potential suggestions to aid in the development of safer online spaces.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 95%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 95%
- Identifying subgroups with differential levels of service response to a digital screening and service navigation program for unmet social care needs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 94%
- Social networking service, patient-generated health data, and population health informatics: patterns and implications for using digital technologies to support mental health 93%
- Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 95%
- Use of the Internet and digital devices among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions 94%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 93%
- Common Practices for Sociodemographic Data Reporting in Digital Mental Health Intervention Research: A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Online Advice-Seekers for Recovering from Opioid Use Disorder 93%
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 93%
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.