Back

Immunological Signatures During Type 2 Diabetes Development and Progression among Mexican Americans in Starr County, Texas

Biguetti, C. C.; Chaves-Neto, A. H.; Elvin, P.; La Fontaine, J.; Brown, E. L.; Hanis, C. L.; Fakhouri, W. D.

2025-06-24 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.06.23.25329883 medRxiv
Show abstract

Previous studies implicate immune dysregulation in the metabolic changes accompanying obesity and type 2 diabetes. This study investigated the interplay between metabolic and immunological parameters during the progression of type 2 diabetes in an obese Mexican American cohort from Starr County, Texas. Individuals matched for age, gender, and BMI were stratified into five categories: diabetes-free, isolated impaired glucose tolerance, combined glucose impairment (fasting or post-load), type 2 diabetes without complications, and type 2 diabetes with lower extremity complications. Buffy samples were analyzed via Luminex Multiplex Assay for IL-4, IL-17A, MCP-1, and HMGB1. HMGB1 levels were significantly elevated in individuals with prediabetes and the combined glucose intolerance group compared to the diabetes-free group and those with diabetes. Elevated HMGB1 levels positively correlated with Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) for insulin resistance (p = 0.03) and showed a moderate negative correlation with insulin sensitivity (p = 0.060). IL-17A levels were elevated in the diabetes group without complications compared to those with combined glucose impairment. The combined diabetes group exhibited the poorest glycemic control. In summary, HMGB1 is a potential early marker of insulin resistance and diabetes progression in Mexican Americans from an underserved community. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=98 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25329883v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5a7dd3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fac385org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13a89aforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2548ff_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.