Societal costs for the closest family relatives of patients with brain disorders in Denmark: a population-based cohort study
Thomsen, M. K.; Rasmussen, T. B.; Olsen, J.; Skipper, N.; Stallknecht, S. B.; Plana-Ripoll, O.; Christiansen, C. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundBrain disorders, including neurological conditions and mental disorders, pose a considerable economic burden in Denmark. However, the costs of illness are not limited to the patients themselves, as the consequences of living with a brain disorder may also impact close relatives. AimWe aimed to assess excess societal costs related to healthcare utilization and income loss for the closest family relatives of patients with brain disorders. MethodsThis population-based cohort study included the closest family relatives of patients with prevalent (by Jan 1, 2021) or incident (during 2016-2021) brain disorders. They were compared with corresponding relatives of matched population comparisons. Patients were categorized into three age strata: children and young people (0-24 years), adults (25-64 years), and older adults (65+ years). We specified criteria for identifying the closest family relative for each age stratum. Using data from national registries, we estimated attributable healthcare costs, and for working-age relatives (18-65 years), we also estimated income loss. ResultsIn 2021, close relatives of patients with brain disorders included 125,495 fathers and 96,154 mothers of children and young people, 880,661 relatives of adults, and 378,826 relatives of older adults. The pooled attributable costs of brain disorders incurred by closest family relatives were 2,407 million EUR for prevalent disease in 2021 and 794 million EUR for incident disease the first year following incidence. The dominating cost component was income loss for working-age relatives. ConclusionThe higher healthcare costs and especially the lower income for relatives of patients with brain disorders adds to the societal economic burden of brain disorders in Denmark. Informal care provided by relatives may contribute to this, underscoring the need to consider their caregiving burden in questions of healthcare prioritization.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative approach to interpret DYRK1A variants, leading to a frequent neurodevelopmental disorder 90%
- Heterogeneity of comprehensive clinical phenotype and longitudinal adaptive function and correlation with computational predictions of severity of missense genotypes in KIF1A-associated neurological disorder 90%
- GM1 Gangliosidosis Type II: Results of a 10-Year Prospective Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of common psychiatric disorders, suicidal behaviours and premature mortality following violent victimisation: A matched cohort and sibling-comparison study of 127,628 people who experienced violence in Finland and Sweden 91%
- Overall and cause-specific hospitalisation and death after COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: cohort study in OpenSAFELY using linked primary care, secondary care and death registration data 90%
- Rapid Epidemiological Analysis of Comorbidities and Treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): a population-based case-control study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-exome sequencing in 16,511 individuals reveals a role of the HTRA1 protease and its substrate EGFL8 in brain white matter hyperintensities 89%
- Data-driven neuroanatomical subtypes of primary progressive aphasia 89%
- Somatic mutation involving diverse genes leads to a spectrum of focal cortical malformations 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kleine Levin syndrome is associated with birth difficulties and genetic variants in the TRANK1 gene loci 91%
- Neuron-specific transcriptomic signatures indicate neuroinflammation and altered neuronal activity in ASD temporal cortex 88%
- Variability in excess deaths across countries with different vulnerability during 2020-2023 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.