Selective sweeps and the role of divergent and parallel selection in Amazonian and Andean bird diversification
Luzuriaga-Aveiga, V. E.; Thorstensen, M. J.; Jankowski, J. E.; Weir, J. T.
Show abstract
Both divergent and parallel selection can contribute to evolutionary change, yet their relative contributions to adaptation and speciation are poorly understood, especially during environmental change. We quantified selective sweep signatures and divergence times in Amazonian avian sister species pairs that either differ in elevation and are expected to have experienced strong divergent selection; or occur in similar lowland habitats and are expected to have experienced strong parallel selection. We found that elevational differentiation resulted in a greater accumulation of selective sweep signatures over the five-million-year timespan covered by our dataset, supporting the importance of divergent selection. Nevertheless, lowland-restricted species pairs accumulated more selective sweeps over the most recent two million years, suggesting that parallel selection, driven by major Pleistocene glacial cycles, produced faster evolutionary change than divergent selection in elevationally differentiated species pairs. Our results highlight parallel selection as an important driver of adaptation and evolution, especially during environmental instability.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomics of Neotropical biodiversity indicators: two butterfly radiations with rampant chromosomal rearrangements and hybridisation 93%
- Genomic islands of differentiation in a rapid avian radiation have been driven by recent selective sweeps 93%
- Genes and sites under adaptation at the phylogenetic scale also exhibit adaptation at the population-genetic scale 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.