Tracking funding disparities in global health aid with machine learning
Stürenburg, F.; Forster, K.; Banholzer, N.; Toetzke, M.; Harttgen, K.; Feuerriegel, S.
Show abstract
Reducing the global burden of disease is crucial for improving health outcomes worldwide. However, misalignment between health aid and country-level disease burden leaves vulnerable populations without necessary support for major health challenges, particularly in the least developed countries. In this paper, we develop a machine learning pipeline using large language models to track flows in official development assistance (ODA) earmarked for health and identify aid-burden misalignment. Specifically, we classified 3.7 million development aid projects from 2000 to 2022 (USD [~]332 billion) into 17 major categories of communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (CMNNDs) and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). We then compared the rank of per capita ODA disbursement against the rank of disease burden (i.e., disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) to identify relative aid-burden misalignment at the country level. Even though funding and disease burden are significantly correlated for many diseases, there are notable disparities. For example, NCDs account for 59.5% of global DALYs but received only 2.5% of health-related ODA. This disparity is particularly concerning because, in low and middle-income countries, there is an increasing double burden: not only from the traditional burden of CMNNDs, but also from the rising burden of NCDs. Our results also show that several regions face severe aid-burden misalignment across multiple diseases including Central Africa and parts of South Asia and West Africa. Our results identify health disparities to inform public policy decisions in development aid assistance. Overall, our machine learning approach supports the targeted allocation of health aid where it is most needed, thereby reducing the global burden of diseases.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- WASH interventions and child diarrhea at the interface of climate and socioeconomic position in Bangladesh 91%
- Geographic pair-matching in large-scale cluster randomized trials 91%
- Bayesian machine learning enables discovery of risk factors for hepatosplenic multimorbidity related to schistosomiasis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation and worldwide monitoring of the effective reproductive number of SARS-CoV-2 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in South Africa and epidemiological characteristics of the Omicron variant 91%
- Impact of COVID-19-related disruptions to measles, meningococcal A, and yellow fever vaccination in 10 countries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of health system strengthening on delivery strategies to improve child immunization coverage and inequalities in rural Madagascar 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of standardised seroprevalence studies, from January 2020 to December 2021 91%
- State of the evidence: a survey of global disparities in clinical trials 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying the dynamics of COVID-19 burden and impact of interventions in Java, Indonesia 91%
- Estimated durations of asymptomatic, symptomatic, and care-seeking phases of tuberculosis disease 90%
- COVID-19 inequalities in England: a mathematical modelling study of transmission risk and clinical vulnerability by socioeconomic status 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.