Chronic health conditions and health-related economic inactivity in midlife: Evidence from the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts
Gimeno, L.; Bridger Staatz, C.; Goisis, A.; Dowd, J.; Ploubidis, G. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundHealth-related economic inactivity is a growing concern in the United Kingdom but little is known about how the relationship between health and work participation has changed across cohorts. MethodsWe used data from two British birth cohorts born in 1958 (National Child Development Study, n = 9,761) and 1970 (British Cohort Study, n = 7,336). We examined how self-reported chronic health conditions at age 42 (longstanding illness, obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, back pain, and mental ill-health) were associated with economic activity at ages 50-54, focusing on health-related inactivity. Multinomial logistic regression models, adjusted for previous economic activity and sociodemographic characteristics, were used to estimate average marginal effects (AME). ResultsPoor health was more prevalent in the 1970c, including among those still working at age 50-54. Longstanding illness and mental ill-health were associated with a higher risk of health-related inactivity in both cohorts. A longstanding illness at age 42 was associated with a 6 percentage-point increase in health-related inactivity risk a decade later (AME1958 = 5.9 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.7, 9.1], AME1970 = 6.5 [95%CI 3.4, 9.6]), and mental ill-health with a 4.5 percentage-point higher risk (AME1958 = 4.4 [95%CI 0.9, 7.9], AME1970 = 4.5 [95%CI 1.1, 7.8]). The magnitude of associations was similar across cohorts except for high blood pressure. ConclusionsChronic health conditions in early midlife were strongly associated with a health-related inactivity, despite contextual change. Preventing ill-health and supporting employment for those with chronic conditions is key to face the challenges of population ageing.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long COVID and financial outcomes: Evidence from four longitudinal population surveys 94%
- Associations of schooling type, qualification type, and subsequent health in mid-adulthood: Evidence from the 1970 British Cohort Study 93%
- Population-level changes in the mental health of UK workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study using Understanding Society 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- What Explains the Socioeconomic Status-Health Gradient? Evidence from Workplace COVID-19 Infections 91%
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 89%
- Racial Differences in Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Physical, Mental, and Behavioral Health 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of COVID-19 on sick leave 93%
- Effects of body mass index on relationship status, social contact, and socioeconomic position: Mendelian Randomization study in UK Biobank 92%
- The Causal Effects of Health Conditions and Risk Factors on Social and Socioeconomic Outcomes: Mendelian Randomization in UK Biobank 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- What if risk factors influenced the variability of health outcomes as well as the mean? Evidence and implications 92%
- Associations between vitamin D and disease risk may be attributed to the confounding influence of adiposity during childhood and adulthood: a lifecourse Mendelian randomization study 90%
- Weakening of the cognition and height association from 1957 to 2018: findings from four British birth cohort studies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic inequalities in co-morbidity of overweight, obesity and mental ill-health from adolescence to mid-adulthood in two national birth cohort studies 93%
- Post COVID-19 Condition, Work Ability and Occupational Changes: Results from a Population-based Cohort 91%
- Changing probability of experiencing food insecurity by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.