An umbrella review of the facilitators and barriers to implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions within hospital settings: through the lens of the NASSS framework (spread, scale-up and sustainability)
Clark, S. E.; Mathur, S.; Barrado-Martin, Y.; El-Sayed, A.; Zhao, Y.; Khadjesari, Z.; Stevenson, F.; Lovat, L.; Vindrola-Padros, C.
Show abstract
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are revolutionising the healthcare sector, but challenges exist in AI adoption and its long-term use. This umbrella review aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers of AI implementation within hospitals and was registered on PROSPERO. Five databases (MEDLINE, HMIC, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science and Cochrane Reviews) were searched in January 2025, 763 articles were screened, with 13 included. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies implementing AI that were conducted within the hospital setting. The quality of the data were assessed using the ROBIS checklist and data were extracted using the NASSS (Nonadoption, Abandonment, and challenges to the Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability) framework, to demonstrate how AI implementation was affected by: whether the AI solution had been technologically validated to ensure generalisability across departments; evidence the AI solution brings measurable gains; a lack of trust or understanding among hospital staff; the budgets and resources available to onboard the AI solution, train staff, and maintain the solution; the need for national policies on funding and regulating AI solutions. These factors affected the adoption, spread, scalability and sustainability of AI implementation and could be considered in future implementation efforts. The study was funded by the NIHR (NIHR205439).
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 94%
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 93%
- An electronic application to improve management of infections in low-income neonatal units: pilot implementation of the NeoTree Beta App in a public sector hospital in Zimbabwe. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis 93%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 93%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Purchasing high-cost medical equipment in hospitals: A systematic review 93%
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 93%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.