Back

Multimodal single-cell analyses reveal distinct fusion-regulated transcriptional programs in Ewing sarcoma.

Waltner, O. G.; Apfelbaum, A. A.; Wrenn, E. D.; Bhise, S. S.; Kanaan, S. B.; Gladden, R. G.; Mendoza, M. A.; Volden, R.; Kronenberg, Z.; Patel, A.; Dyer, M.; Sarthy, J. F.; Lawlor, E. R.; Furlan, S. N.

2025-06-24 genomics
10.1101/2025.06.18.660457 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a fusion-driven malignancy, peaking in adolescence. Although EwS tumors are driven uniquely by EWS::FLI1 and related fusions, patient outcomes vary greatly. If and how tumor plasticity of EWS::FLI1-regulated transcriptional signatures contribute to disease progression is not known. To address this, we utilized a single-cell co-assay of RNA and chromatin accessibility (ATAC) sequencing to identify gene regulatory networks in EwS. By comprehensively characterizing regulatory elements across cell lines, we identified multiple unique modules of gene regulation. Differential usage and prevalence of these modules was evident across cell lines, associated with distinct epigenetic and transcriptomic signatures, and in specific cases, modifiable by exogenous TGF-{beta}. When we examined primary EwS patient tumors, we observed these same regulatory modules were variably enriched both across and within tumors, highlighting the existence of intratumoral heterogeneity in gene regulatory networks. Our findings demonstrate that multiple, co-existing transcriptional programs shape the phenotypic diversity of EwS and suggest that the balance between these networks may have important implications for clinical outcomes and targeted therapy development. SummaryMultimodal transcriptional analysis reveal how Ewing sarcoma tumors use distinct gene programs, including one linked to TGF-{beta}, to drive cancer behavior and progression.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.