Back

Condition-dependent, amorphous protein agglomerates control cytoplasmic rheology

Losa, J.; Simon, F.; Linnik, D.; Kaya, S. G.; Stuart, M. C. A.; Stetsenko, A.; de Boer, R.; Ho, F. Y.; Incarnato, D.; Stevens, J.; van Eck, J.; Fraaije, M. W.; Weiss, L. E.; van Teeffelen, S.; Abeln, S.; Guskov, A.; Marrink, S.-J.; Poolman, B.; Heinemann, M.

2025-06-21 biophysics
10.1101/2025.06.17.660151 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular crowding in the bacterial cytoplasm restricts the diffusion of large molecules, impacting cellular processes. However, how nutrient availability influences cytoplasmic rheology is not well understood. With single-particle tracking in Escherichia coli, we observed a threefold variation in the diffusion of a 40-nm particle across exponential growth conditions. Previously suggested determinants of rheology did not account for this variation; instead, we found a strong anticorrelation between the diffusion coefficient and the abundance of amino acid metabolism proteins, persisting upon genetic perturbations and showing that lower diffusion is associated with increased viscoelasticity. Photoactivated light microscopy revealed that some amino acid metabolism proteins form clusters. Electron microscopy showed that these proteins could form amorphous agglomerates at physiological concentrations in vitro, likely driven by their low intrinsic disorder, high compactness and hydropathy score. These findings show that protein agglomerates regulate cytoplasmic rheology in a condition-dependent manner, suggesting an underappreciated level of cytoplasmic organization. HighlightsO_LIDiffusion of 40-nm particles varies threefold across growth conditions in E. coli C_LIO_LICytoplasmic diffusion inversely correlates with COG-E protein abundance COG-E proteins form agglomerates that increase cytoplasmic viscoelasticity C_LIO_LIProtein compactness and hydrophobicity predict condition-dependent crowding effects C_LI

Published in Molecular Cell (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.