Back

Population-specific brain charts reveal Chinese-Western differences in neurodevelopmental trajectories

Sun, L.; Qin, W.; Liang, X.; Wang, C.; Men, W.; Duan, Y.; Fan, X.-R.; Cai, Q.; Qiu, S.; Wang, M.; Gong, Q.; Tian, Y.; Liang, P.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Song, H.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, P.; Dong, Q.; Tao, S.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, J.; Xie, F.; Feng, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, C.; Qian, Q.; Zhang, B.; Meng, M.; Hu, L.; Gao, J.-H.; Jiang, T.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, H.; Liao, W.; Wang, D.; Wang, H.; Guo, T.; Dai, Z.; Lui, S.; Xu, K.; Li, L.; Xie, P.; Feng, C.; Cui, G.; Wu, J.; Yin, X.; Ding, G.; Xian, J.; Zhao, L.; Lu, J.; Liu, Z.; Han, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Si, T.; Zhou, F.; Bi, Y.; Wu, D.; Gao, F.; Wang,

2025-06-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.17.659820 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human brain charts provide unprecedented opportunities for decoding neurodevelopmental milestones and establishing clinical benchmarks for precision brain medicine 1-7. However, current lifespan brain charts are primarily derived from European and North American cohorts, with Asian populations severely underrepresented. Here, we present the first population-specific brain charts for China, developed through the Chinese Lifespan Brain Mapping Consortium (Phase I) using neuroimaging data from 43,037 participants (aged 0-100 years) across 384 sites nationwide. We establish the lifespan normative trajectories for 296 structural brain phenotypes, encompassing global, subcortical, and cortical measures. Cross-population comparisons with Western brain charts (based on data from 56,339 participants aged 0-100 years) reveal distinct neurodevelopmental patterns in the Chinese population, including prolonged cortical and subcortical maturation, accelerated cerebellar growth, and earlier development of sensorimotor regions relative to paralimbic regions. Crucially, these Chinese-specific charts outperform Western-derived models in predicting healthy brain phenotypes and detecting pathological deviations in Chinese clinical cohorts. These findings highlight the urgent need for diverse, population-representative brain charts to advance equitable precision neuroscience and improve clinical validity across populations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.