Interactive delineation and quantification of anatomical structure with virtual reality
Garkov, D.; Lein, E.; Kielkopf, N.; Dullin, C.; Klein, K.; Sommer, B.; Jordan, A. L.; Schreiber, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundFull tissue segmentation is laborious, especially for non-model organisms, whereas accurate and reliable delineation still requires much firsthand visual inspection. A virtual environment can be equipped with suitable data representations, interaction techniques, and method interfaces as to enable the interactive delineation and quantification of anatomical structure. Situated in such an environment, analysts can benefit from reduced pre-processing, but also from in-situ learning and collaboration. ResultsTherefore, we apply virtual reality as a method to visualise and derive higher-level anatomical features from low-level descriptors. Following voxel-size calibration, scalable delineations and measurements are performed in virtual reality. The data representation for delineation is volume visualisation: a volume rendering or an isosurface mesh. Two delineation techniques are proposed for the placement and editing of points and segments in virtual reality. For quantification, different measures and metrics can be computed for each delineated region. To mitigate some of the fundamental challenges of virtual reality, e. g., mid-air interaction affecting precision at a distance, different virtual-reality affordances were considered as part of the design. As a result, we present Brainacle, a virtual reality application, and make its usage freely available. We incorporate Brainacle in a synchrotron tomography reconstruction pipeline to delineate and quantify the gross brain regions of 20 individuals from six species of African cichlid fish. ConclusionBrainacle, an editor for the interactive delineation and quantification of anatomical structures in virtual reality, is applicable to different biological pipelines and workflows. In particular, Brainacle can be used to quickly gain an overview of structure, ease repetitive delineation and measurement, and visually inspect and communicate findings.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A digital collection of rare and endangered lemurs and other primates from the Duke Lemur Center 94%
- The Ithildin library for efficient numerical solution of anisotropic reaction-diffusion problems in excitable media 94%
- ConfluentFUCCI for fully-automated analysis of cell-cycle progression in a highly dense collective of migrating cells 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multimodal computational pipeline for 3D histology of the human brain 93%
- Persistent homology analysis distinguishes pathological bone microstructure in non-linear microscopy images 92%
- An Assistive Computer Vision Tool to Automatically Detect Changes in Fish Behavior In Response to Ambient Odor 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.