Exploring participation bias in a home-based exercise and physical activity intervention study among kidney transplant recipients - an observational comparative study
De Beir, J.; Vandecruys, M.; Renier, M.; Cornelissen, V.; De Smet, S.; De Geest, S.; Van Craenenbroeck, A. H.; Monbaliu, D.; Van Biesen, W.; Nagler, E. V.; Verbeke, F.; Vanden Wyngaert, K.; Calders, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundLimited knowledge exists about individuals who decline participation in exercise trials. This study compared characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in a kidney transplant exercise trial using a dual-consent design. MethodsThe study was nested within the PHOENIX-Kidney randomized controlled trial, which evaluated a home-based exercise and physical activity intervention in kidney transplant recipients. At three months post-transplant, eligible individuals were invited to participate via two parallel consent pathways: one for trial participation and one for observational data of nonparticipants. Both groups completed self-reported questionnaires on sociodemographics, physical activity levels, and perceived motivators and barriers to physical activity. Reasons for nonparticipation were documented, and clinical data were extracted from medical records. Group comparisons used t-tests, Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Fishers exact tests. ResultsOf 345 screened kidney transplant recipients, 58% were eligible. Ineligibility was primarily due to medical contraindications (26%), language barriers (24%), and multi-organ transplantation (20%). Among eligible individuals, 88 (44%) enrolled in the intervention and 65 (35%) completed the observational follow-up for nonparticipants. Major reasons for nonparticipation included lack of time (23%), and feeling sufficiently active (20%). Nonparticipants reported higher physical activity levels (195 [120-360] vs. 103 [19-180] minutes per week; P = 0.003), while participants had higher motivator scores for physical activity (2.1 [1.6 - 2.4] vs. 1.5 [1.1 - 1.9]; P < 0.01). ConclusionThe dual-consent approach enabled unique insights into differences between participants and nonparticipants, which can inform strategies to reduce participation bias and enhance inclusivity in future trials. Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier number: NCT06260579.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient Perceptions by Race of Educational Animations About Living Kidney Donation Made for a Diverse Population 94%
- Return to work outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients: a protocol for a global scoping review 94%
- Fatigue in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis and Mortality: A Real-World Side-by-Side Study in Brazil and the United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rehabilitation interventions to modify physical frailty in adults before lung transplantation: A systematic review protocol 94%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 93%
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Intradialytic Exercise on Dialysis Patient Survival: A Randomized Controlled Trial 96%
- Health-related hope and reduced distress associated with fluid and dietary restrictions in advanced chronic kidney disease and dialysis: a cohort study 94%
- Ramadan and Kidney disease (RaK) risk assessment tool. Potential Risk Calculator for Evaluating the Risk of Ramadan Fasting In Chronic Kidney Disease patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of immunosuppressive regimen on diffusivity and oxygenation of kidney transplants – analysis of functional MRI data from the randomized ZEUS trial 91%
- Laboratory diagnostic of acute kidney injury and its progression: risk of underdiagnosis in female and elderly patients 91%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.