Back

Molecular, haemodynamic and functional effects of LSD in the human brain

McCulloch, D. E.-W.; Larsen, K.; Johansen, A.; Reveles Jensen, K. H.; Nykjaer, C. H.; Holze, F.; Falck, N.; Neufeld, V. A. B.; Steenstrup, E.; Skov-Andersen, P. M.; Spangaard, A.; Geisler, M.; Randrup, P. P.; Jensen, P. S.; Shulganov, V.; Johansen, S. S.; Nielsen, M. K. K.; Andersen, T. L.; Stenbaek, D. S.; Svarer, C.; Fisher, P. M.; Knudsen, G. M.

2025-06-18 neurology
10.1101/2025.06.17.25329677 medRxiv
Show abstract

In this study, we provide the first study to integrate molecular and functional neuroimaging during psychedelic drug effects in humans. Using simultaneous PET-MRI technology, we describe multiple brain actions of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in seven healthy volunteers blinded to LSD dose received. We quantify the occupancy of LSD at cerebral serotonin 2A receptors and show that LSD increases global cerebral blood flow (CBF) and internal carotid artery flow without affecting the diameter of the internal carotid artery, opposite effects to those observed following psilocybin. Functional connectivity analyses show decreases in global connectivity (GCOR). Change in GCOR is negatively correlated with change in CBF. We observe an anticlockwise hysteresis loop between plasma drug levels and subjective effects, suggesting atypical pharmacodynamic mechanisms. We contrast our CBF and GCOR findings and their relation in a separate cohort of 25 participants administered psilocybin, highlighting key consistencies and differences in their neural effects. By establishing the dose-occupancy relation of LSD in humans, our findings provide critical insights for the clinical development of psychedelic compounds and demonstrate unique neurophysiological effects that distinguish LSD from related psychedelics.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.