Back

Larval environment reshapes mosquito disease risk via phenotypic and molecular plasticity

Chandrasegaran, K.; Walker, M.; Marano, J. M.; Rami, S.; Bisese, A.; Weger-Lucarelli, J.; Lahondere, C.; Robert, M. A.; Childs, L. M.; Vinauger, C.

2025-06-21 physiology
10.1101/2025.06.16.659972 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early-life environmental conditions can exert profound, lasting effects on adult phenotypes, with major consequences for fitness and disease transmission, especially in holometabolous insects like mosquitoes, which are a key vector species. Yet, the molecular mechanisms through which juvenile environments shape adult physiology and behavior via transstadial effects remain largely unresolved. Here, we demonstrate that larval competition, a key ecological stressor, profoundly alters adult body size, survival, reproductive output, host-seeking behavior, olfactory neurophysiology, and vector competence in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Crucially, using transcriptomic profiling and integrative network analyses, we identify seven regulatory hub genes whose expression is strongly associated with size-dependent variation in olfactory behavior, reproductive investment, and Zika virus transmission potential. These hub genes belong to gene modules enriched for functions in chemosensory processing, metabolic regulation, and signal transduction, revealing a molecular framework mediating environmentally induced plasticity across metamorphosis. Integrating these empirical findings into a transmission model, we show that incomplete larval control can inadvertently increase outbreak risk by producing larger, longer-lived, and more competent vectors. Our results uncover molecular mechanisms underpinning phenotypic plasticity in disease vectors and highlight the critical need to account for transstadial effects in models of vector-borne disease transmission.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.