Back

Circadian disruption beneath the surface: a screening approach to identify actigraphy-based markers of split shift work in submariners

Marques, D.; Fernandes, C.; Barbosa-Morais, N. L.; Reis, C.

2025-06-19 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.16.659930 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying behavioral markers of disease risk associated with circadian disruption remains challenging due to reproducibility concerns, as human studies are often under-powered to detect the effects of interest. Submarines provide an extreme example of cir-cadian disruption, depriving individuals of natural light-dark cycles and limiting oppor-tunities for physical activity. To address these challenges, we developed an effect size-based method to robustly screen potential actigraphy-derived markers of the submarine environment. Actigraphy data was collected across the pre-mission, mission and post-mission periods. During the mission, crew members followed a 6-hours-on/6-hours-off split shift schedule, except for submariners with on-call duty or extended hours. Forty-one actigraphy variables were screened for their ability to differentiate between study periods and shifts. A Monte Carlo permutation test was used for this initial screening, followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for pairwise compar-isons. Light-related features, the slopes of regression lines fitted to the daily predicted dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) trajectories, and Pearson correlation coefficients be-tween each recording day and its corresponding predicted DLMO demonstrated the great-est potential to distinguish between study periods. Most high-performing features dis-criminated between split shift work schedules and on-call or extended-hours schedules. Only the relative amplitude (RA) and the average light intensity during the five least-illuminated hours of the day (L5) reliably distinguished between the shift performing the bulk of nighttime work and its counterpart. Although submarine settings offer an oppor-tunity to study a healthy population living under confined movement and dim light, de-tecting biological signals through actigraphy in this environment is inherently challeng-ing. Demonstrating robust effects under these conditions supports the use of actigraphy in dimly-lit, isolated, confined, and extreme (DICE) environments, but also its applica-bility to study other operational or clinical populations with reduced activity levels.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.4%
2
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
8
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
13
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%