Back

Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: a systematic framework for motion artifact removal

Le Meur-Diebolt, S.; Pereira, F. C.; Mariani, J.-C.; Kliewer, A.; Farinha-Ferreira, M.; Bertolo, A.; Osmanski, B.-F.; Lenkei, Z.; Deffieux, T.

2025-06-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.16.659882 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional ultrasound imaging (fUSI) is a promising tool for studying brain activity in awake and behaving animals, offering insights into neural dynamics that are more naturalistic than those obtained under anesthesia. However, motion artifacts pose a significant challenge, introducing biases that can compromise the integrity of the data. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation and benchmarking of strategies for detecting and removing motion artifacts in transcranial fUSI acquisitions of awake mice. We evaluated 792 denoising strategies across four datasets, focusing on clutter filtering, scrubbing, frequency filtering, and confound regression methods. Our findings highlight the superior performance of adaptive clutter filtering and aCompCor confound regression in mitigating motion artifacts while preserving functional connectivity patterns. We also demonstrate that high-pass filtering is generally more effective than band-pass filtering in the presence of motion artifacts. Additionally, we show that with effective clutter filtering, scrubbing may become optional, which is particularly beneficial for experimental designs where motion correlates with conditions of interest. Based on these insights, we propose four optimized denoising paradigms tailored to different experimental constraints, providing practical recommendations for enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of fUSI data. Our findings challenge current practices in the field and have immediate practical implications for existing fUSI analysis workflows, paving the way for more sophisticated applications of fUSI in studying complex brain functions and dysfunctions in awake experimental paradigms.

Published in Imaging Neuroscience (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.