Back

Type IV minor pilin ComN predicted the USS-receptor in Pasteurellaceae

Helsem, S. A.; Alfsnes, K.; Frye, S. A.; Hesselberg Lovestad, A. Y.; Ambur, O. H.

2025-06-16 microbiology
10.1101/2025.06.16.659825 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Uptake Signal Sequence (USS) receptor, facilitating acquisition of homologous DNA by natural transformation in Haemophilus influenzae and other Pasteurellaceae, remains unknown. Assuming extracellular USS-binding in accordance with experimental data and existing models of the transformation process, discriminating functional gene ontology assessment, cellular localization predictions and deep-learning structural modeling of protein-DNA complexes, a prepilin peptidase-dependent protein A (PpdA), was identified as the strongest USS receptor candidate in different Pasteurellaceae family members with divergent USS specificities. PpdA was the only orthogroup to be modeled to form specific protein-USS complexes significantly better than complexes with sequence-scrambled versions of USS by AlphaFold3. Further analyses of PpdA complexes, from ten different Pasteurellaceae with divergent USS-type enrichment, using geometric deep learning protein-DNA sequence specificity predictions and coevolution analyses were found to further support this USS receptor candidacy. PpdA was found to share overall structural domains with the non-sequence specific DNA receptor FimT in Legionella pneumophila and a particular {beta}-sheet transversing disulfide-bridge with ComP, the DNA uptake sequence receptor of the Neisseriaceae. In compliance with a previously given gene name, we propose ComN to be used for these PpdA orthologs which structurally and evolutionary were here predicted to be the USS-receptors in Pasteurellaceae.

Published in Frontiers in Microbiology (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.