Back

A Multiscale Framework for Uncovering Surfactant Mediated Viral Capsid Disruption

Masirevic, S.; Marzinek, J. K.; Kong, M. L. Y.; Lin, G.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Chua, C.; Maupin, C. M.; Verma, C. S.; Fox, S. J.; Bond, P. J.

2025-06-17 biophysics
10.1101/2025.06.16.659739 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Disinfection remains a critical strategy for controlling the transmission of infectious diseases. However, small non-enveloped viruses exhibit exceptional resistance to many disinfectants, often requiring harsh protein-disrupting chemicals for effective inactivation, thereby limiting their applicability in personal care products due to associated side effects. Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) is a widely used anionic surfactant known for its virucidal efficacy; however, the molecular details of its action against robust non-enveloped viruses remain poorly understood, limiting efforts to design safer and more targeted antiviral formulations. In this study, a multiscale simulation approach combining a novel atomic-resolution icosahedral "scaffold framework" and coarse-grained modelling was developed to elucidate the mechanism of SDS-driven disruption of MS2 bacteriophage capsid, a surrogate for non-enveloped viruses. Experimental analyses including dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy revealed that SDS inactivates MS2 in a strongly pH-dependent manner, triggering capsid disassembly at acidic pH while leaving particles largely intact at neutral pH. Molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that SDS micelles preferentially associate with hexameric pores and inter-dimer clefts under acidic conditions, where protonation of acidic residues weakens the electrostatic network of the capsid surface. Together, these findings provide a detailed molecular framework for SDS virucidal action and highlight the importance of environmental pH in modulating surfactant-virus interactions. These insights offer a foundation for designing next-generation antiviral surfactants with improved efficacy and biocompatibility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
4
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
10
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
21
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%