Perceptions of electronic health records by minority ethnic groups in mental health: A systematic literature review
Ikram, A.; Parveen, S.; Vaportzis, E.
Show abstract
The implementation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in mental health contexts has been slow. Reasons for this include concerns from health care professionals regarding the collection of sensitive information and the stigma associated with mental health services. Despite the low uptake of EHRs, the benefits include patients feeling empowered and in control of their own treatment. However, minority ethnic groups often access mental health services through crisis pathways and have been found to disengage with EHRs. The aim of this review was to explore minority ethnic groups perceptions of the utility of mental health EHRs and establish perceived barriers and facilitators to access. MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Included papers mentioned minority ethnic groups from the 37 listed countries on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and included service users, clients or patients accessing EHRs in mental healthcare settings. Papers were required to be published between 2009 - 2025. Eight papers met all criteria for inclusion, and three themes emerged: Limited English proficiency as a barrier, Lack of access to technology and Perceived impact of EHRs on access to care. Barriers to access EHRs with limited English proficiency, no access to technology, and stigma was a significant issue for minority ethnic groups due to concerns of who has access to the electronic health data. Benefits of accessing EHRs included easier and efficient access to records. EHRs are critical for modern health systems and further work is required to improve EHRs usage in mental health systems for minority ethnic groups.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 95%
- Co-development of a best practice checklist for mental health data science: A Delphi study 94%
- Use of the Internet and digital devices among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 94%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 92%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 95%
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 94%
- Pathways to mental health services across local health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: Findings from a Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 93%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 93%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common Practices for Sociodemographic Data Reporting in Digital Mental Health Intervention Research: A Scoping Review 94%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 92%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.