Back

Influence of F Repeats and Terminal Residue Polarity on Peptide-VIM-2 Metallo-β-Lactamase Interactions

Anand, A. A.; Anwar, S.; Mondal, R. K.; Samanta, S. K.

2025-08-14 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.15.659760 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The global surge in antimicrobial resistance is a major public health concern, largely driven by the dissemination of beta-lactamases. Among them, VIM-2 metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) poses a significant therapeutic challenge. In this study, we explore the role of phenylalanine and lysine residues, especially their repeat patterns, in modulating peptide binding affinity and structural interactions with VIM-2. Docking, molecular dynamics simulations, free energy decomposition analysis and residue analysis were conducted on gut metagenome-derived AMPs, PolyF and a control peptide (PolyR). Binding affinity with VIM-2 decreased with declining F content, yet PolyF alone showed unexpectedly low binding. However, PolyF exhibited most negative polar solvation energy in free energy decomposition analysis. This indicates that F repeats play a role in stabilizing a VIM-2-peptide complex in presence of a solvent. PolyF peptide lacks favorable electrostatic or dynamic interactions, likely due to the absence of K residues. Interestingly, loop1 and loop2 analysis of VIM-2 revealed that F repeats interfere with the loops that play a role in functioning of substrate binding at the active site. Additionally, F repeats were found to bind to residues lying adjacent to or nearby active site residues, which points towards the fact that F helps other residues like K to bind more stably with active site residues of VIM-2. Finally, analog designing and analysis reveals that a balance of aromatic (F) and positively charged (K) residues could enhance peptide binding with MBLs like VIM-2 when having hydrophobic on N-terminal and positively charged on C-terminal.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.