Real-Time Human Interaction with Virtual Swarms in Shared Physical Space
Mezey, D.; Bartashevich, P.; Hasbani, G. E.; Romanczuk, P.; Hamann, H.; Deffner, D.; James, D.
Show abstract
Human-swarm interaction (HSI) explores how humans engage with distributed collective systems, aiming to incorporate human cognition into scalable and robust robotic swarms. While most HSI research focuses on remote teleoperation via engineered interfaces, real-world integration of swarms into everyday tasks requires natural, embodied interactions in shared physical spaces. To address the limitations of traditional teleoperation studies, and the high resource demands of using physical robot swarms for HSI research, we introduce CoBe XR, a spatial augmented reality system that projects virtual swarms into the physical environment of the human operator. CoBe XR enables real-time, fine-grained, natural interaction between humans and swarm-like agents through full-body movement without dedicated control interfaces or prior training. As a proof-of-concept, we present a behavioral study involving 40 participants who influenced swarm behavior solely through walking. Our results show that human participants were able to adapt to the collective dynamics of the swarm and control it through natural perception-motion control in a shared physical space. We argue that similar extended reality systems can not only reveal how humans perceive and adapt to collective dynamics, but they offer a general platform to understand human behavior or an intermediate solution to design embodied robot swarms.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ARBUR, a machine learning-based analysis system for relating behaviors and ultrasonic vocalizations of rats 93%
- Coherently Remapping Toroidal Cells But Not Grid Cells are Responsible for Path Integration in Virtual Agents 93%
- Achieving natural behavior in a robot using neurally inspired hierarchical control 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.