Back

Predicting Spatial Transcriptomics from H&E Image by Pretrained Contrastive Alignment Learning

Zou, J.; Xiao, K.; Chen, Z.; Pei, J.; Xu, J.; Chen, T.; Hou, L.; Wu, C.; She, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Chen, L.

2025-06-19 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.15.659438 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The intricate molecular landscape within tissues holds crucial information about cellular behavior and disease progression, yet capturing this complexity at a spatial level remains challenging. While Spatial transcriptomics (ST) offers valuable insights into gene expression patterns within their native tissue context, its widespread adoption is hindered by high costs and limited gene detection capabilities. Here we introduce CarHE (Contrastive Alignment of gene expRession for hematoxylin and eosin image), a method that overcomes these limitations by accurately predicting high-dimensional ST data (over 10,000 genes) solely from readily available H&E (Hematoxylin and Eosin) stained images. This novel pre-trained architecture employs contrastive learning through two mechanisms: cell-type-based transcriptomics information transfer and image-based histology information transfer. These mechanisms precisely align image features with spatial single-cell gene expressions, achieving prediction accuracies exceeding 0.7 (up to 1.7 folds compared to second best) across diverse tissue types and species. CarHEs superior performance extends to identifying subtle pathological features such as tertiary lymphoid structures in various cancers, including breast cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and ccRCC (clear cell renal cell carcinoma), and reconstructing 3D spatial transcriptomics from images alone, offering a cost-effective and robust alternative for large-scale spatial transcriptomics. We further validated CarHEs effectiveness by predicting DFS (Disease-Free Survival) from >1,600 lung cancer patients HE images, achieving a significantly higher AUC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) of 0.73 compared to state-of-the-art alternatives (0.58-0.64).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.