Back

Boltz-2: Towards Accurate and Efficient Binding Affinity Prediction

Passaro, S.; Corso, G.; Wohlwend, J.; Reveiz, M.; Thaler, S.; Ram Somnath, V.; Getz, N.; Portnoi, T.; Roy, J.; Stark, H.; Kwabi-Addo, D.; Beaini, D.; Jaakkola, T.; Barzilay, R.

2025-06-18 molecular biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.06.14.659707 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurately modeling biomolecular interactions is a central challenge in modern biology. While recent advances, such as AlphaFold3 and Boltz-1, have substantially improved our ability to predict biomolecular complex structures, these models still fall short in predicting binding affinity, a critical property underlying molecular function and therapeutic efficacy. Here, we present Boltz-2, a new structural biology foundation model that exhibits strong performance for both structure and affinity prediction. Boltz-2 introduces controllability features including experimental method conditioning, distance constraints, and multi-chain template integration for structure prediction, and is, to our knowledge, the first AI model to approach the performance of free-energy perturbation (FEP) methods in estimating small molecule-protein binding affinity. Crucially, it achieves strong correlation with experimental readouts on many benchmarks, while being at least 1000x more computationally efficient than FEP. By coupling Boltz-2 with a generative model for small molecules, we demonstrate an effective workflow to find diverse, synthesizable, high-affinity binders, as estimated by absolute FEP simulations on the TYK2 target. To foster broad adoption and further innovation at the intersection of machine learning and biology, we are releasing Boltz-2 weights, inference, and training code 1 under a permissive open license, providing a robust and extensible foundation for both academic and industrial research.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.