Back

Multi-Scale Parcellation of Dynamic Causal Models of the Brain

Zarghami, T. S.

2025-06-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.14.659698 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The hierarchical organization of the brains distributed network has received growing interest from the neuroscientific community, largely because of its potential to enhance our understanding of human cognition and behavior, in health and disease. This interest is motivated by the hypothesis that near-critical brain dynamics enable multiscale integration and segregation of neural dynamics. While most multiscale connectivity analyses focus on structural and functional networks, characterizing the effective connectome across multiple scales has been somewhat overlooked--primarily for computational reasons. The difficulty of estimating large cyclic causal models, together with the scarcity of theoretical frameworks for systematically moving between scales, has hindered progress in this direction. This technical note introduces a top-down multiscale parcellation scheme for dynamic causal models, with application to neuroimaging data. The method is based on Bayesian model comparison, as a generalization of the well-known {Delta}BIC method. To facilitate computation, recent developments in linear dynamic causal modeling (DCM) and Bayesian model reduction (BMR) are deployed. Specifically, a naive version of BMR is introduced, enabling the parcellation scheme to scale to hundreds or thousands of regions. Notably, the derivations reveal an analytical relationship between reduced model evidence and minimum cut problem in graph theory. This duality puts the tools of graph theory at the service of model evidence optimization and significance testing. The proposed method was applied to simulated and empirical causal models to establish face and construct validity. Consequently, the large empirical causal network, inferred from a neuroimaging dataset, exhibited log-log scaling trends, suggestive of scale invariance in multiple dynamical measures. Future generalizations of this technique and its potential applications in systems and clinical neuroscience are discussed.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.7%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.7%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
7
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
9
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
10
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
11
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Biostatistics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
18
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
20
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
27
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%
29
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%