A general allometric rule predicts sustainable growth across societies
Angulo, M. T.; Michel-Mata, S.; Velasco-Hernandez, J. X.; Saavedra, S.; Marquet, P. A.
Show abstract
Balancing population growth against finite resources remains a foundational challenge in sustainability science. Although qualitative sustainability principles have matured over decades, translating these principles into universal quantitative rules has been challenging due to the diverse environmental and cultural contexts under which human societies develop. Here, we demonstrate that a general sustainability rule emerges naturally when population-resource feedbacks follow empirically observed allometric scaling laws, condensing ecological, technological, and social complexities into four fundamental parameters. This rule predicts "sustainability corridors" within which societies must remain to ensure long-term persistence. Testing our theoretically derived rule against ethnographic data from 299 hunter-gatherer societies across varied ecological and social environments, we find consistent alignment: these societies tend to occupy the predicted corridors despite substantial contextual differences. By grounding sustainability in biophysical scaling rather than context-specific variables, our approach bridges ecology and sustainability science, suggesting that despite cultural and technological differences, all societies face fundamental constraints for sustainable growth.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The limits to parapatric speciation 3: Evolution of strong reproductive isolation in presence of gene flow despite limited ecological differentiation. 96%
- The evolution of paternal care: a role for microbes? 95%
- Modelling the prebiotic origins of regulation & agency in evolving protocell ecologies 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.