Back

Is it time to retire {triangleup}?

Zubarev, R. A.

2025-06-17 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.06.13.659563 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The paradigm postulating that tissue stable isotopic ratios ({delta}tissue) equal those of the diet ({delta}diet) plus a small, quasi-constant isotope discrimination factor {Delta} emerged in the late 1970s, establishing stable isotope analysis as a dietary proxy. Today, this framework is still widely used across multiple branches of science, despite growing contradicting evidence. Here, we reanalysed several well-controlled laboratory experiments and universally found that {Delta} not only varies strongly with{delta} diet, but also changes sign at a certain{delta} eq ={delta} diet ={delta} tissue value, which we term the {Delta}-equilibrium. The {Delta}-equilibrium phenomenon results from the sub-unity slope of the linear regression between{delta} diet and{delta} tissue and leads to converging of{delta} tissue values. The most frequently observed position of the {Delta}-equilibrium on the ({delta}13C,{delta} 15N) plane is (-21{+/-}1{per thousand}, 12{+/-}1{per thousand}). These findings firmly establish that stable isotopes are not neutral spectators but active participants in biochemical processes. If presented evidence holds in a much broader study, the paradigm{delta} tissue ={delta} food + {Delta} can finally be retired after half a century of service, being replaced by{delta} tissue = ax{delta}food + Const, where a is the newly defined isotope assimilation factor. The {Delta}-equilibrium position is then found as{delta} eq = Const/(1 - a). The reason for isotope convergence remains a subject for future research, but likely hypotheses include evolutionary adaptation and isotopic resonance.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
54.7%
50% of probability mass above
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.2%
3
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
12
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
21
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%