Back

Simple 3D-Printed Stirred Bioreactor Enhances Retinal Organoid Production Via Improved Oxygenation

Schwab, K.; Hwang, P.; Nam, K.; Batz, Z.; Hiriyanna, S.; Regent, F.; Morgan, N.; Lelkes, P.; Li, T.

2025-06-20 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.06.13.659558 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Retinal organoids (ROs), derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), simulate in vivo development and retinal morphology, providing a platform to study retinal development and diseases. However, current differentiation protocols often yield inconsistent results with substantial cell line and batch variability. These protocols utilize static culture methods that rely on passive oxygen diffusion to reach the vessel bottom, where adherent hPSCs initially differentiate. Static culture is standard for adherent monolayer cells and is presumed suitable for RO differentiation. We questioned this assumption given that, during differentiation, the monolayer hPSCs become highly structured and multi-layered, first as neural rosettes and then as optic vesicles (OVs). We hypothesized that the cellular oxygen consumption rate would exceed the rate of delivery via passive diffusion, particularly to inner regions of emerging OVs. To test this hypothesis, we measured dissolved oxygen concentrations at the vessel bottom and found that within hours of media change, oxygen dropped to < 1 %, a level considered non-physiologically hypoxic, which imperils cell viability. This non-physiological hypoxia caused OV degeneration, hypoxic marker expression, and necrosis. To address this problem, we developed a novel 3D-printed stirred bioreactor (SBR) that maintains physiological oxygen levels between [~]4-6%. This approach significantly improved organoid yield, quality, and reproducibility while being easily adaptable to typical laboratory cell culture workflows. We conclude that non-physiological hypoxia, a previously unappreciated condition, is a limiting factor underlying inconsistent yield and quality in RO production. Physiological oxygenation levels can be restored by the SBR platform, resulting in greater consistency and improved production outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
7
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
8
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
24
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
29
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%