Multiresolution Clustering of Genomic Data
Turfah, A.; Wen, X.
Show abstract
Cluster analysis is a widely used unsupervised learning technique in genomic data analysis, with critical applications such as inferring genetic population structures and annotating cell types from single-cell RNA-seq data. However, most existing clustering methods focus on identifying a single optimal partition while overlooking intrinsic relationships among the inferred clusters. Moreover, clustering results produced by different algorithms often appear inconsistent, and there is a lack of principled approaches to extract shared, biologically meaningful patterns across diverse clustering outputs. In this work, we introduce a computational framework that enables systematic exploration of multi-resolution clustering structures in genomic data, starting from an initial configuration generated by any available clustering algorithm. The proposed algorithm provides a unified and principled approach for uncovering complex, nested biological relationships and reconciling discrepancies among clustering results. We demonstrate the utility of our framework through comprehensive simulations and applications to both genetic and single-cell transcriptomic datasets, highlighting its ability to recover interpretable and reproducible clustering structures. Furthermore, we show that our multi-resolution cluster analysis of complex genomic data yields valuable insights into patterns of human population migration and cell differentiation trajectories.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- GoM DE: interpreting structure in sequence count data with differential expression analysis allowing for grades of membership 96%
- Visualizing scRNA-Seq Data at Population Scale with GloScope 96%
- scDesign2: a transparent simulator that generates high-fidelity single-cell gene expression count data with gene correlations captured 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.