Humanized Caffeine-Inducible Systems for Controlling Cellular Functions
Scheller, L.; Correia, B.; Elia, M.; Kang, C.; Bonati, L.; Gainza, P.; Garodia, Y.; Deshpande, P.; Schmidt, J.; Georgeon, S.; Tang, L.
Show abstract
Current cell therapies are limited by the lack of tools for controlling gene expression using humanized systems responsive to non-toxic stimuli. Starting from nanobodies that homodimerize in response to caffeine, we computationally designed inducible heterodimers and humanized the best-performing pairs. We used the resulting caffeine-inducible domains in engineered cytokine receptors for caffeine-inducible STAT3 signaling and in split transcription factors (caff-TFs) containing human-derived zinc-finger proteins. Heterodimerization of split transcription factors drastically enhanced their performance compared to homodimerization. We demonstrate that caff-TFs are compatible with lentiviral and retroviral delivery to Jurkat T-cells and enable inducible expression of therapeutic genes such as chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) in response to caffeine concentrations consistent with normal coffee consumption. By using the common, non-toxic molecule caffeine, and exclusively humanized protein components, these systems promise to be a safer alternative to existing systems and may be used in synthetic biology applications and for safer, more effective cell therapies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-input drug-controlled switches of mammalian gene expression based on engineered nuclear hormone receptors 96%
- Degron-based bioPROTACs for controlling signaling in CAR T cells 96%
- Engineering a novel probiotic toolkit in Escherichia coli Nissle1917 for sensing and mitigating gut inflammatory diseases 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.