A computational model to study hemodynamics during atrial fibrillation
Plappert, F.; Oomen, P. J. A.; Jones, C. E.; Charitakis, E.; Karlsson, L. O.; Platonov, P. G.; Wallman, M.; Sandberg, F.
Show abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with reduced cardiac output, which is correlated with increased symptomatic burden and declined quality of life. Predicting hemodynamic effects of AF remains challenging due to the complex interplay of multiple contributing mechanisms. Computational modeling offers a valuable tool for simulating hemodynamics. However, existing models are lacking the capabilities to both replicate beat-to-beat hemodynamic variations during AF while being well suited for fitting to clinical data. In this study, we present a computational model comprising: 1) an electrical subsystem that generates uncoordinated atrial and irregular ventricular activation times characteristic of AF, and 2) a mechanical subsystem that simulates hemodynamics using a reduced order model. The model was fitted to replicate individual hemodynamic measurements from 17 patients in the SMURF study during both normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and AF. The fitted model matched a large majority (75%) of blood pressure and intracardiac pressure measurements in both NSR and AF with absolute simulation errors well below 10 mmHg. Furthermore, a large majority of left atrial and left ventricular ejection fraction measurements during NSR were matched with absolute simulation errors well below 10%. The model consistently underestimated right ventricular diastolic pressure during NSR while overestimating right ventricular systolic and mean left atrial pressures during AF. The presented approach of modeling atrial activity in AF as uncoordinated atrial contractions, rather than no atrial contraction, achieved lower overall absolute simulation errors when fitting to individual patients. This computationally efficient model provides a platform for future investigations of patient-specific hemodynamics during AF.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Electrophysiological characterization of human atria: the understated role of temperature 96%
- Demonstration of Patient-Specific Simulations To Assess Left Atrial Appendage Thrombogenesis Risk 95%
- A Reproducible Protocol to Assess Arrhythmia Vulnerability in Silico: Pacing at the End of the Effective Refractory Period 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic computational assessment of atrial function impairment due to fibrotic remodeling in electromechanical properties 96%
- Arrhythmia Mechanisms and Spontaneous Calcium Release: I - Multi-scale Modelling Approaches 95%
- Arrhythmia Mechanisms and Spontaneous Calcium Release: II - From Calcium Spark to Re-entry and Back 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pulmonary vein flow split effects in patient-specific simulations of left atrial flow 95%
- Uncertainty in cardiovascular digital twins despite non-normal errors in 4D flow MRI: identifying reliable biomarkers such as ventricular relaxation rate 93%
- Personalized computational hemodynamic analysis in transcatheter aortic valve: investigation of long-term degeneration 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Rapid Electromechanical Model To Predict Reverse Remodeling Following Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy 97%
- A fast computational model for circulatory dynamics:Effects of left ventricle-aorta coupling 95%
- Modeling cardiac microcirculation for the simulation of coronary flow and 3D myocardial perfusion 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.