Back

An open dataset of cerebral tau deposition in young healthy adults based on MK6240 positron emission tomography

Lam, J.; Rodriguez-Cruces, R.; Arafat, T.; Royer, J.; Chen, J.; Dascal, A.; Sahlas, E.; Pana, R.; Hopewell, R.; Hsiao, C. H.-H.; Massarweh, G.; Soucy, J.-P.; Villeneuve, S.; Caciagli, L.; Koepp, M.; Bernasconi, A.; Bernasconi, N.; Bernhardt, B.

2025-06-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.13.655622 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tauopathies are pathologies wherein phosphorylated insoluble tau aggregates in neurons, leading to dysfunction and degeneration. Positron emission tomography (PET) enables measurement of in vivo tau, with second-generation radiotracers such as [18F]MK6240 showing high tau affinity with minimal off-target binding. While tauopathies are commonly linked to age-related neurodegenerative diseases, notably Alzheimers disease (AD), evidence suggests pathophysiological cascades may begin long before clinical onset. Increasingly, tau is recognized in pathologies affecting younger individuals, including autosomal dominant AD, Niemann-Pick disease type C, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, and epilepsy, thus highlighting the importance of normative data in non-geriatric populations. Here, we present a dataset of 33 young to middle-age healthy adults (mean age 34.0{+/-}10.4 years, 12 female) with [18F]MK6240 PET data and T1w magnetic resonance imaging. Longitudinal data are also available in a subset of 9 participants with a minimum follow-up time of 1 year. Our dataset aims to support imaging biomarker studies on younger individuals potentially at risk for AD and to advance work in tauopathies affecting non-geriatric populations generally excluded from neurodegeneration studies.

Published in Scientific Data (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.