Bridging the Heterogeneity of Myasthenia Gravis Severity Scores for Digital Twin Development
Garbey, M.; Lesport, Q.; Kaminski, H. J.
Show abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune neuromuscular disease. Clinical trials with rigorously collected data, especially for rare diseases, provide opportunities for mathematical modeling of patient outcomes over time; however, building a larger data set from multiple trials faces the challenge of harmonization of outcome measures. To accurately model MG and predict individual patient trajectories, one requires integrating three primary data types: (i) Laboratory and medication data, (ii) Electronic Health Record (EHR) data (e.g., age, sex, years since diagnosis, BMI), (iii) Disease severity scores. Among these, MG severity scores are crucial for measuring disease progression from the patients and clinical evaluators perspectives. However, clinical studies often employ various scoring systems (e.g., ADL, QMG, MG-CE, MGQOL-15), making it challenging to determine the most reliable measure. In this study, we investigate the relationships among clinical outcome measures across multiple clinical studies. Our objective is to develop a robust "Myasthenia Gravis Portrait" that can be applied across diverse clinical studies. This standardized portrait will facilitate the creation of a virtual population of digital twins, enabling the application of machine learning techniques to a larger patient population.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients using machine learning 95%
- Predicting Adverse Drug Effects: A Heterogeneous Graph Convolution Network with a Multi-layer Perceptron Approach 94%
- Towards development of a statistical framework to evaluate myotonic dystrophy type 1 mRNA biomarkers in the context of a clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SymScore: Machine Learning Accuracy Meets Transparency in a Symbolic Regression-Based Clinical Score Generator 93%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 93%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 93%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 93%
- Explainable deep learning for disease activity prediction in chronic inflammatory joint diseases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 93%
- Ontology-based expansion of virtual gene panels to improve diagnostic efficiency for rare genetic diseases 93%
- Combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves prediction of heart failure deaths 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- HeartNet: Self Multi-Head Attention Mechanism via Convolutional Network with Adversarial Data Synthesis for ECG-based Arrhythmia Classification 93%
- Identifying Protein Complexes in Protein-protein Interaction Data using Graph Convolution Network 92%
- Reliable data collection in participatory trials to assess digital healthcare apps. 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.