Back

Tissue-resident neutrophils serve homeostatic and immunological functions in embryos

Hofmann, J.; Lintukorpi, L.; Lokka, E.; Ojasalo, V.; Cisneros Montalvo, S.; Kaukonen, D.; Ma, L.; Kotaja, N.; Gerke, H.; Salmi, M.; Rantakari, P.

2025-06-17 immunology
10.1101/2025.06.12.659311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Development of neutrophils in the bone marrow and their crucial role in first-line defense are well understood in adults, but remarkably little is known about fetal neutrophils. Here, we analyzed the production, distribution, and functions of neutrophils during embryonic development in the mouse. We discovered that multiple non-hematopoietic steady-state organs harbor substantial numbers of immature and mature neutrophils, many of which are localized to tissue parenchyma outside the vessels. Using single-cell transcriptomic analyses, we revealed the presence of neutrophil progenitors and precursor cells in the blood and even in non-hematopoietic tissues in fetal and newborn mice. Embryonic tissue-resident neutrophils were transcriptionally different from embryonic blood-borne neutrophils and adult neutrophils. We demonstrated, through functional analyses, that embryonic neutrophils proliferated actively, had a high glycolytic capacity, and exhibited distinct diurnal rhythmicity. Embryonic neutrophils displayed lineage-specific innate immune effector functions and were responsive to maternal immunostimulation and immunosuppression. Using a genetic embryonic neutrophil depletion model, we discovered that neutrophils impact the piRNA pathway in the testis. Collectively, our data provides an atlas of the fetal neutrophil landscape and dissects their responses in steady-state. SummaryNon-hematopoietic steady-state tissues harbor extravascular immature and mature neutrophils during fetal development. Embryonic neutrophils are endowed with multiple effector mechanisms and also serve homeostatic roles during tissue development.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.