Back

Inferring Spatially Varying Bending Stiffness of Biopolymers with Deep-Learning Approach

Hong, C.; Lim, C.; Oh, J.; Lee, J.-B.; Jeong, E. E.; Yoo, J.-Y.; Kim, W. K.; Jeon, J.-H.

2025-06-17 biophysics
10.1101/2025.06.12.659266 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The bendability of biopolymers, including DNA, actin filaments, and microtubules, is crucial to diverse biological processes, such as cell motility and cytoskeletal organization. While conventional polymer models like the worm-like chain model assume uniform bending stiffness along the contour, biopolymers in reality often attain spatially varying bending stiffness as a result of complex cellular interactions. For instance, the bending stiffness of actin filaments and microtubules varies in response to associated binding proteins or chemical modifications. Despite its biological implications, measuring the position-dependent persistence length along polymer contours remains challenging. Here, we present a deep-learning-based method that quantitatively predicts spatially varying bending stiffness of biopolymers. Our framework segments a polymer chain into short over-lapping fragments, predicts local persistence lengths using a deep-learning model, and reconstructs full profiles. Using simulated data, we demonstrate that our approach achieves high accuracy and robustness even under data-scarce conditions. Applied to various biological systems, our method reveals a spatially varying stiffness from tip to base in filopodia as well as spatially heterogeneous stiffness in microtubules. Additionally, we investigate the internal mechanism of our deep-learning model and show that the model utilizes multiple physics-related features for persistence length estimation while adaptively adjusting its attention based on polymer stiffness.

Published in Machine Learning: Science and Technology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.