Back

Endothelial Cells retain inflammatory memory through chromatin remodeling

Gonsales Spindola, D.; Clark, S.; Bahr, A.; Pin de Jesus, G.; Martino, N.; Lowery, A. M.; Lyu, S.; Seeman, A.; Martino, G.; Albeche Duarte, G.; Crosbourne, E.; Vincent, P.; MacNamara, K. C.; Adam, A. P.; Bossardi Ramos, R.

2025-06-17 cell biology
10.1101/2025.06.12.659136 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sepsis survivors face a heightened risk of secondary infections and chronic vascular dysfunction despite clinical recovery, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly defined. Our study identifies a novel mechanism of endothelial inflammatory memory, wherein transient inflammatory exposure induces durable chromatin remodeling, priming endothelial cells for exaggerated responses to subsequent inflammatory insults. Utilizing a clinically relevant two-hit mouse model, cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) followed by secondary Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) infection, we reveal persistent transcriptional activation in endothelial cells (ECs), characterized by amplified expression of inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1), complement factors, and interferon-stimulated genes. Genome-wide ATAC-seq analyses demonstrated stable chromatin accessibility at key inflammatory loci, indicative of epigenetic priming. Mechanistically, we uncovered a critical role for the AP-1 transcription factor JunB in mediating this epigenetic remodeling. JunB knockdown attenuated chromatin accessibility and subsequent transcriptional amplification upon secondary challenge, pinpointing JunB-driven chromatin modifications as central to endothelial reprogramming. Our findings offer mechanistic insights into how transient inflammation creates lasting epigenetic states within the endothelium, highlighting JunB as a potential therapeutic target to mitigate chronic endothelial dysfunction and increased susceptibility to secondary infections post-sepsis.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.