Back

Dissecting the biological impact of GBA1 mutations using multi-omics in an isogenic setting

Alvarez Jerez, P.; Wild Crea, P. A.; Patel, D.; Glasstetter, L. M.; Alvarez, C.; Makarious, M. B.; Lara, E.; Chen, Y.; Pantazis, C. B.; Paquette, K.; Malik, L.; Nalls, M. A.; Reed, X.; Singleton, A. B.; Billingsley, K. J.; Mcdonough, J. A.; Ning, G.; Skarnes, W. C.; Ryten, M.; Sidransky, E.; Cookson, M. R.; Beilina, S.; Blauwendraat, C.

2025-06-15 genomics
10.1101/2025.06.12.656971 bioRxiv
Show abstract

GBA1 is a risk gene for multiple neurodegenerative diseases, including Lewy Body Dementia and Parkinsons disease, and biallelic pathogenic variants in the gene result in the lysosomal storage disorder Gaucher disease. GBA1 encodes the enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GCase), and alterations in the gene result in reduced enzymatic activity, which affects lysosome function downstream. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are a useful tool for testing the functional consequences of gene variants in an isogenic setting. Additionally, they can be used to perform multiomic studies to explore biological effects independent of disease mechanisms. Using CRISPR-edited isogenic KOLF2.1J iPSC lines containing pathogenic GBA1 variants D409H (p.D448H), D409V (p.D448V) and GBA1 knockout line generated by the iPSC Neurodegenerative Disease Initiative (iNDI), we examined potential molecular mechanisms and downstream consequences of GCase reduction. In this study, we confirm that this isogenic series behaves as expected for loss of function variants, despite the known difficulties with GBA1 editing. We identified that there are limited overlapping results across cell types suggesting potential different downstream effects caused by GBA1 variants. Additionally, we note that RNA-based quantitation may not be the best method to characterize GCase mechanisms, but protein and metabolomic analyses may be used to evaluate differences across genotypes.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Omics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.9%
3
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
4
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.5%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
6
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.3%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
9
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
11
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
12
Glia
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
13
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Molecular Neurodegeneration
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.5%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.5%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
19
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
21
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
24
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
25
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
26
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
27
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
28
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%