Back

A Thiopurine-like Mutagenic Process Defines TGCT Subtypes

Brown, K. M.; Zhong, J.; Miranda, A. M.; Zhang, M.; Williams, J.; Williams, J.; Zhang, H.; Liang, C.; Li, W.; Zhu, B.; Chanock, S. J.; Nathanson, K. L.; Zhang, T.

2025-06-12 genomics
10.1101/2025.06.12.655573 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are the most common malignancy in young men, exhibit a unique developmental origin and exceptional chemosensitivity. However, the molecular distinctions between TGCT subtypes remain poorly understood. Here we present a comprehensive genomic analysis of 252 treatment-naive primary TGCTs, integrating deep whole-genome sequencing with matched transcriptomic and epigenomic data. We identify new driver genes and uncover defining features of TGCTs, including pervasive chromosome X amplification with subtype-specific X chromosome inactivation, and a germ cell-like transcriptional program. Although previously reported, whole genome doubling (WGD) in TGCTs is further characterized here as ubiquitous, developmentally early, and associated with age at onset. Seminomas are enriched for early driver mutations, secondary WGD events, sustained XIST expression and replication stress-associated indel mutational signatures, while non-seminomas show greater structural complexity, subclonal diversity, relatively earlier-onset WGD, extended tumor latency, and telomere elongation. Moreover, we identify a mutational signature, SBS87, that is exceptionally rare across cancers with exception of thiopurine-treated leukemia, but strikingly prevalent in TGCT, especially non-seminomas. SBS87 is linked to extended tumor latency and telomere elongation, implicating possible environmental or endogenous processes that mimic thiopurine-induced DNA damage in TGCT pathogenesis. Collectively, our findings define TGCTs as molecularly distinct tumors shaped by early genomic instability and highlight SBS87 as a novel mutational footprint with potential etiologic and clinical relevance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.