Back

Health Profiles of Factory and Office Workers in Malaysia: A Survey Study

Alebiosu, A.

2025-06-13 public and global health
10.1101/2025.06.12.25329539 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionOccupational settings expose workers to varying health risks that may lead to both immediate and long-term health complications. These risks, which include chemical, biological, and physical hazards, can affect individuals differently depending on workplace conditions, exposure levels, and host factors such as immune status. This study aimed to compare the health profiles of workers in three distinct work environments: an electronics factory, an office, and a winery. MethodologyA cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire that collected data on demographic characteristics, workplace conditions, and self-reported health symptoms. A total of 98 workers with at least six months of experience at their respective workplaces participated. Ethical approval and written informed consent were obtained prior to data collection. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2003. ResultsThe results revealed distinct health profiles across the three occupational settings. Back and neck pain was commonly reported at all sites, affecting more than 60% of respondents. Electronics factory workers experienced a higher prevalence of cough (62.1%), frequent thirst (45.5%), and headaches (50%), likely linked to chemical exposure and poor air quality. Office workers reported the highest rates of respiratory and skin-related symptoms, including sneezing (71%), dry skin (58.8%), and memory difficulties (47%), suggesting potential indoor air quality issues. Winery workers exhibited a notably higher prevalence of shortness of breath (40%) and frequent thirst (60%), possibly due to poor ventilation and physical exertion. ConclusionThis study provides valuable baseline data on occupational health differences across work settings, underscoring the need for targeted interventions, improved ergonomic designs, and further longitudinal research.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.