Clinically reported covert cerebrovascular disease and risk of neurological disease: a whole-population cohort of 395,273 people using natural language processing
Iveson, M. H.; Mukherjee, M.; Davidson, E. M.; Zhang, H.; Sherlock, L.; Ball, E. L.; Mair, G.; Hosking, A.; Whalley, H.; Poon, M. T. C.; Wardlaw, J. M.; Kent, D.; Tobin, R.; Grover, C.; Alex, B.; Whiteley, W. N.
10.1101/2025.06.12.25329472 medRxivShow abstract
BackgroundThe relevance of covert cerebrovascular disease (CCD) in practice is uncertain, in part because estimation of risk in whole clinical populations is difficult. To address this gap, we measured clinically reported CCD in a large clinical cohort using natural language processing (NLP) and estimated subsequent disease risk in linked health record data. MethodsFrom all people with brain imaging in Scotland from 2010 to 2018, we selected people with no prior hospitalisation for neurological disease. Four phenotypes were identified with NLP of imaging reports: white matter hypoattenuation or hyperintensities (WMH), lacunes, cortical infarcts and cerebral atrophy. Hazard ratios (aHR) for stroke, dementia, and Parkinsons disease (conditions previously associated with CCD), epilepsy (a brain-based control condition) and colorectal cancer (a non-brain control condition), adjusted for age, sex, deprivation, region, scan modality, and pre-scan healthcare, were calculated for each phenotype. FindingsFrom 367,988 people with brain imaging and no history of neurological disease, 129,199 (35%) had [≥]1 phenotype. For each phenotype, the aHR of any stroke was: WMH 1{middle dot}4 (95%CI: 1{middle dot}3-1{middle dot}4), lacunes 1{middle dot}6 (1{middle dot}5-1{middle dot}6), cortical infarct 1{middle dot}8 (1{middle dot}7-1{middle dot}9), and cerebral atrophy 1{middle dot}1 (1{middle dot}0-1{middle dot}1). The aHR of any dementia was: WMH 1{middle dot}3 (1{middle dot}3-1{middle dot}3), lacunes 1{middle dot}0 (0{middle dot}9-1{middle dot}0), cortical infarct 1{middle dot}1 (1{middle dot}1-1{middle dot}2) and cerebral atrophy 1{middle dot}7 (1{middle dot}7-1{middle dot}8). The aHR of Parkinsons disease was, in people with a report of: WMH 1{middle dot}1 (1{middle dot}0-1{middle dot}2), lacunes 1{middle dot}1 (0{middle dot}9-1{middle dot}2), cortical infarct 0{middle dot}7 (0{middle dot}6-0{middle dot}9) and cerebral atrophy 1{middle dot}4 (1{middle dot}3-1{middle dot}5). The aHRs between CCD phenotypes and epilepsy and colorectal cancer overlapped the null. InterpretationNLP identified CCD and atrophy phenotypes from routine clinical image reports, and these had important associations with future stroke, dementia and Parkinsons disease. Prevention of neurological disease in people with CCD should be a priority for healthcare providers and policymakers. FundingThe Chief Scientists Office, the Medical Research Council, the Alzheimers Society, Health Data Research UK, the Wellcome Trust, Research Data Scotland, MQ - Transforming Mental Health, The Alan Turing Institute, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Stroke Association. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSSystematic reviews of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cohort studies show that people with asymptomatic, covert cerebrovascular disease (CCD) have an increased risk of stroke, dementia and Parkinsons disease. Covert brain infarcts, identified with natural language processing (NLP) show similar associations in one US-based insurance system. However, there is a lack of data on clinically-reported CCD from whole populations. Added value of this studyThis study used a validated NLP algorithm to identify CCD and cerebral atrophy from both MRI and computed tomography (CT) imaging reports generated during routine healthcare in >367K people in Scotland. It also distinguished between three CCD phenotypes - white matter hypoattenuation/hyperintensities, lacunes, cortical infarcts - and cerebral atrophy, and their associations with stroke and dementia and their subtypes. In adjusted models, we demonstrate higher risk of dementia (particularly Alzheimers disease) in people with atrophy, and higher risk of stroke in people with cortical infarcts. However, associations with an age-associated control outcome (colorectal cancer) were neutral, supporting a causal relationship. It also highlights differential associations between cerebral atrophy and dementia and cortical infarcts and stroke risk. Implications of all the available evidenceCCD or atrophy on brain imaging reports in routine clinical practice is associated with a higher risk of stroke or dementia. Evidence is needed to support treatment strategies to reduce this risk. NLP can identify these important, otherwise uncoded, disease phenotypes, allowing research at scale into imaging-based biomarkers of dementia and stroke.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Anterior cingulate sulcation is associated with onset and survival in frontotemporal dementia 93%
- Development of Prognostic Models for Survival and Care Status in Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease 92%
- Detection of cognitive deficits years prior to clinical diagnosis across neurological conditions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lesions in putative language and attention regions are linked to more severe strokes in patients with higher white matter hyperintensity burden 92%
- Biomarker changes preceding symptom onset in genetic prion disease 91%
- Risk of dementia after hospitalization due to traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal, population-based study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between Liver Fibrosis and Incident Dementia in the UK Biobank Study 93%
- Antiherpetic medication and incident dementia: observational cohort studies in four countries 92%
- Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a (network) meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.