High-Capacity transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HC-tDCS)
Donnery, K.; FallahRad, M.; Khadka, N.; Saw, M.; Babaev, B.; Osorio, S.; Koochesfahani, M. B.; Bhuiyan, R.; Elwassif, J. M.; Bikson, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundEnhancing tDCS technology can support the delivery of higher current intensities, enabling broader dose-response studies in human trials. MethodsHigh-Capacity tDCS (HC-tDCS) integrates novel electrodes and adaptive current/voltage controlled electronics. Multi-layer HC electrodes include polarity-specific redox layers and designed hydrogel interfaces, shaped for a bifrontotemporal montage. The stimulator design includes adaptive ramps with hybrid voltage-current control and low (7.5 V) compliance voltage. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were used to characterize electrode properties. Tolerability of HD-tDCS was tested for target currents 1-6 mA (in 1 mA increments) for 30 min on 5 healthy subjects, and compared with conventional tDCS using 2 mA F3-F4 sponge-electrodes. MRI-derived computational models predicted cortical electric fields. Tolerability was assessed according to the 100 mm visual analogue scale for pain (VASP-100), skin erythema assessment, thermal imaging, and adverse event questionnaires. ResultsThe electrode design including high-roughness polarity-specific capacity, electrochemically supports high-charge direct current stimulation. In all subjects, HC-tDCS was well tolerated at all tested doses (1-6 mA) with minor transient adverse events and average VASP-100 less than 15. VASP-100 during sponge-electrode tDCS at 2 mA was comparable to 5 and 6 mA HC-tDCS. HC-tDCS operates at significantly lower voltage than sponge-tDCS, impacting tolerability and efficiency. Modeling predicts peak frontal electric fields of 0.65-1.08 V/m for 2 mA HC-tDCS and 1.95-3.25 V/m for 6 mA HC-tDCS, compared to 0.49-0.95 V/m for 2 mA sponge-tDCS. ConclusionsHC-tDCS allows increased cortical stimulation; at 6 mA achieving double the 1 V/m electric field threshold in all subjects. Enabled by pre-stimulation procedures, specialized electrodes, and adaptive low-voltage stimulators, HC-tDCS is well tolerated at intensities up to at least 6 mA.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- NeurostimML: A machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage 95%
- Neuromodulation of a peripheral nerve using fully polymeric cuff electrodes: Understanding predictability of selective stimulation 94%
- Defining the impact of deep brain stimulation contact size and shape on neural selectivity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Vibrotactile auricular vagus nerve stimulation alters limbic system connectivity in humans: A pilot study 94%
- Rattractor - Instant guidance of a rat into a virtual cage using a deep brain stimulation 93%
- Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode size matter? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- High Gamma and Beta Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Human Motor Cortex Improves Motor Functions 94%
- Optimal Multichannel Artifact Prediction and Removal for Brain Machine Interfaces and Neural Prosthetics 92%
- Endogenous signals during active movement predict deep brain stimulation evoked potential pathways: Results of a transfer function analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.