Back

The uncertainty partitioning of the terrestrial C cycling over CONUS NEON sites using model-data fusion

Zhang, D.; Qianyu, L.; Helgeson, A.; Serbin, S. P.; Dietze, M. C.

2025-06-17 ecology
10.1101/2025.06.11.659109 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate inventories of terrestrial carbon pools and fluxes are crucial for understanding ecosystem processes, tracking climate change impacts, and meeting the monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) requirements in international treaties and voluntary carbon markets. In meeting this need, the fusion of process-based modeling, field data, and remote sensing observations has the potential to provide more accurate and precise estimates than each alone. However, as the number of data constraints on a system increases, different sources of information can interact with each other in complex ways across space, time, and processes. In this study, we undertake a value-of-information analysis to assess the contribution of different observations to reducing carbon cycle uncertainties across pools, fluxes, and spatial domains within the PEcAn carbon cycle data assimilation system. We used a novel block-based Tobit Gamma Ensemble Filter to assimilate four synergistic data constraints, MODIS leaf area index, Landtrendr aboveground biomass, SMAP soil moisture, and SoilGrids soil organic C, into a process-based ecosystem model (SIPNET) at 39 National Ecological Observatory Network sites across the contiguous U.S. from 2012 to 2021. Results showed that not only did we greatly reduce uncertainty among the directly constrained pools but many observations were able to share information across variables and space. These indirect constraints helped identify synergies and conflicts among data streams and across space, which provides insights for further constraining carbon inventories. Overall, soil carbon remains the largest source of uncertainty in the overall carbon budget due to both its large size and limited observational constraints.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
8
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
9
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
11
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
14
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
19
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
24
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
30
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%