Hippocampal Commissural Circuitry Shows Asymmetric cAMP-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity
Faiss, L.; Salivara, A.; Oldani, S.; Breustedt, J.-M.; Schmitz, D.; Rost, B.
Show abstract
Hemispheric asymmetries in NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity have been described in hippocampal area CA1, but it remains unclear whether similar lateralized mechanisms exist for cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent plasticity. Here, we investigated whether cAMP-mediated potentiation of synaptic transmission in mouse CA1 exhibits hemisphere-specific properties. In recordings with electrical stimulation of CA1 inputs, a subset of recordings in the left, but not in the right hemisphere CA1, exhibited a pronounced cAMP-induced potentiation of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs). To isolate input specific contributions, we expressed the optogenetic actuator ChrimsonR unilaterally in the CA3/CA2 region of wild-type mice. Light-evoked glutamate release from ipsilateral Schaffer collaterals showed no cAMP sensitivity in either hemisphere, while commissures originating from the right (COR) exhibited cAMP-mediated potentiation of transmission in a subset of experiments. Notably, this effect was absent at commissures originating from the left (COL). The selective presence of the effect prompted us to further investigate the underlying cell population using CA3-specific (G32-4 Cre) and CA2-specific (Amigo2-Cre) driver lines. Recordings from synapses of CA3 COR recapitulated the cAMP-induced potentiation of transmitter release observed in wild-type animals. However, the effect was again restricted to a subset of experiments and was absent in recordings with specific stimulation of CA2 COR. Our results demonstrate a variable cAMP-sensitivity of transmitter release at COR synapses in the left CA1. Altogether, we reveal a hemisphere-specific cAMP-mediated synaptic plasticity at CA3 COR onto CA1, underscoring hidden heterogeneity and lateralization in hippocampal circuit function.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Local circuit allowing hypothalamic control of hippocampal area CA2 activity and consequences for CA1 98%
- Presynaptic NMDA receptors facilitate short-term plasticity and BDNF release at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses 97%
- Astrocyte GluN2C NMDA receptors control basal synaptic strengths of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the stratum radiatum 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inhibitory parvalbumin basket cell activity is selectively reduced during hippocampal sharp wave ripples in a mouse model of familial Alzheimer's disease 96%
- Activation of extrasynaptic kainate receptors drives hilar mossy cell activity 96%
- Input / Output Relationships for the Primary Hippocampal Circuit. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acetylcholine prioritises direct synaptic inputs from entorhinal cortex to 1 CA1 by differential modulation of feedforward inhibitory circuits 97%
- An astrocytic signaling loop for frequency-dependent control of dendritic integration and spatial learning 95%
- Sensory input drives rapid homeostatic scaling of the axon initial segment in mouse barrel cortex 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The ventral CA2 region of the hippocampus and its differential contributions to social memory and social aggression 96%
- Dentate Gyrus and CA3 GABAergic Interneurons Bidirectionally Modulate Signatures of Internal and External Drive to CA1 95%
- Ca2+-phospholipid-dependent regulation of Munc13-1 is essential for post-tetanic potentiation at mossy fiber synapses and supports working memory 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lateral entorhinal cortex afferents reconfigure the activity in piriform cortex circuits 94%
- 40 Hz sensory stimulation enhances CA3-CA1 coordination and prospective coding during navigation in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease 94%
- An increase in dendritic plateau potentials is associated with experience-dependent cortical map reorganization 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.