Back

HIV-1 Envelope glycoprotein modulates CXCR4 clustering and dynamics on the T cell membrane

Quijada-Freire, A.; Santiago, C.; Garcia-Cuesta, E. M.; Soler Palacios, B.; Ayala-Bueno, R.; Gardeta, S.; San Sebastian, E.; Armendariz-Burgoa, E.; Puertas, M. C.; Villares, R.; Garaigorta, U.; Gonzalez-Granado, L. I.; Rodriguez Frade, J. M.; Chojnacki, J.; Martinez-Picado, J.; Mellado, M.

2025-06-16 immunology
10.1101/2025.06.11.659074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

HIV-1 entry into susceptible cells requires the dynamic interaction of its envelope (Env) glycoprotein with the host cell receptor CD4 and a co-receptor, either CCR5 or CXCR4. While the core molecular mechanisms driving Env-receptor interactions and subsequent membrane fusion are well characterized, the precise nanoscale spatial reorganization of these co-receptors at the viral binding site remains poorly defined. In this study, we employed single-particle tracking total internal reflection fluorescence (SPT-TIRF) microscopy to quantitatively analyze nanoscale organizational changes of CXCR4 on the surface of CD4+ T cells following binding by X4-tropic HIV-1. Our data reveal that both recombinant X4-gp120 and virus-like particles expressing physiological levels of X4 Env proteins (gp120 and gp41) promote CXCR4 clustering, a phenomenon linked to cell infection. Furthermore, these ligands induced oligomerization of CXCR4R334X, a naturally occurring mutant associated with WHIM syndrome that supports HIV-1 infection but fails to oligomerize in response to CXCL12. Our findings establish a link between CXCR4 clustering and HIV-1 infection, enhancing our understanding of the initial events in viral attachment and entry. These results further suggest that HIV-1 depends on a specific spatial arrangement of co-receptors, distinct from that induced by their natural chemokine ligands, highlighting the critical role of cell-surface receptor spatial organization in dictating cellular function.

Published in eLife (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.